Ghanaian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,798,680 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 19.2%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $49,173, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $104,578, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,540, a difference of 0.10%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $42,542, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $65,326, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.5%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.0%).