Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,255,865 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 184.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 33.6%), median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $47,482, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $53,266, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,842 compared to $38,065, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,836 compared to $84,914, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $76,784, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 60.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 51.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 46.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.8%), currently married (49.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 107.3%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 69.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.49%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.3%).