Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,637,944 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to an increase of 23.7 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $38,065, a difference of 33.8%), median family income ($113,815 compared to $88,267, a difference of 28.9%), and median male earnings ($60,750 compared to $47,482, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.55%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($42,815 compared to $36,023, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 55.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (45.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.5%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.7%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%).