Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Excellent
Fair
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,210,229 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.416% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 416.0 Immigrants from Nicaragua.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $38,065, a difference of 36.0%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $88,267, a difference of 31.6%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $47,482, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,266, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $36,023, a difference of 20.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Tragic
$38,065
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$88,267
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Tragic
$76,784
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Tragic
$41,737
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Tragic
$47,482
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Tragic
$36,023
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$53,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Tragic
$84,914
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Tragic
$89,108
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Tragic
$52,085
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 78.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 58.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.25%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
17.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
31.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Average
82.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 6.4%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
67.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
38.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Average
55.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.8%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
91.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
89.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
88.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
86.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
83.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
79.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
57.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
52.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
40.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Nicaragua
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%