Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,817,306 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,291 compared to $88,267, a difference of 34.0%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $47,482, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $89,108, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $53,266, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $36,023, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 74.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.7%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 55.5%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%).