Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,427,620 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,312 compared to $88,267, a difference of 42.0%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $38,065, a difference of 41.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $84,914, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,266, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $36,023, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 79.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.45%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.5%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 114.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.18%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%).