Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,062,649 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $53,266, a difference of 9.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $52,085, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $36,023, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $84,914, a difference of 0.81%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $76,784, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 33.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.9%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (42.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.10%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).