Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,875,479 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 59.3 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $52,085, a difference of 16.4%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $88,267, a difference of 12.8%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $76,784, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $53,266, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $36,023, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.3%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.15%), currently married (43.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.5%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%).