White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,098,729 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $47,482, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($99,800 compared to $88,267, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $36,023, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $53,266, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $76,784, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 58.3%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 55.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.86%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.60%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).