British West Indian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,653,716 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 66.5 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.6%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $36,023, a difference of 11.9%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $41,737, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,565 compared to $84,914, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($88,987 compared to $88,267, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $52,085, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 199.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 96.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 76.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.6%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.92%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.4%).