Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,544,304 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($104,966 compared to $88,267, a difference of 18.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $52,085, a difference of 18.7%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $47,482, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $53,266, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $84,914, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 63.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 57.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.4%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 28.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.92%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.2%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 43.2%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.5%).