Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,329,912 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,552 compared to $38,065, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($40,340 compared to $36,023, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $84,914, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.53%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $52,085, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,863 compared to $89,108, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and single female poverty (18.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 45.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.1%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.66%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.5%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.8%), bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (95.8% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.63%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.7%).