Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,595,050 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $38,065, a difference of 33.8%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $88,267, a difference of 30.1%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $47,482, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,266, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $36,023, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 66.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (46.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.7%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 75.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 65.8%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%).