Armenian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,330,392 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,287 compared to $38,065, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($109,692 compared to $88,267, a difference of 24.3%), and median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $47,482, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.16%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $36,023, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 54.9%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.8%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%).