South American Indian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,609,353 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 18.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $52,085, a difference of 19.5%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $88,267, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($44,206 compared to $38,065, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.54%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $36,023, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 45.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.4%).