Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Cuba

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,456,909 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 29.5 Immigrants from Cuba.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $44,735, a difference of 27.7%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $78,249, a difference of 20.7%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $43,461, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $50,374, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $76,701, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$34,910
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$78,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$68,461
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$38,426
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$43,461
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$33,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$50,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$76,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$80,662
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$44,735
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 65.0%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
17.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
20.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.3%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
30.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 26.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (44.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
44.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
41.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.6%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
93.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
83.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
80.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
55.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
39.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.38%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Cuba
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%