Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,444,483 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 51.4 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $51,731, a difference of 29.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $114,342, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $117,780, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $55,571, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $66,892, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.4%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.1%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.9%).