Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,966,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 33.1 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,594, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $97,277, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $40,429, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $90,137, a difference of 3.9%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $98,877, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.16%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 57.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.9%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.18%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.60%).