Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Hopi

Fair
Poor
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hopi Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,760,506 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 20.1 Hopi.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Hopi Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $31,177, a difference of 27.7%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $77,188, a difference of 22.4%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $65,043, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $46,978, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $33,932, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $50,925, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$31,177
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$77,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$65,043
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$36,871
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$42,060
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$33,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$46,978
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$75,002
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$75,562
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$50,925
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
20.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 109.5%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 67.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 24.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
27.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
27.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
28.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
21.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 134.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 128.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 119.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
30.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
58.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
31.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
75.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 54.6%), currently married (44.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.60, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.60
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
36.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
50.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
49.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
6.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.3%), bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and associate's degree (43.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (86.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
57.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
50.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
34.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 310.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Hopi Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHopi
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
30.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
52.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%