Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,229,997 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 4.1 West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $40,317, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,583, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($78,682 compared to $78,455, a difference of 0.29%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $87,205, a difference of 0.54%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $50,682, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.0%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 13.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.010%), family households (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 127.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 17.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and associate's degree (43.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.5%).