Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,665,757 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Lithuanians.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 25.8%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $49,448, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $112,484, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,552, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $42,108, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $65,209, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
28.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.1%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.87%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
29.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Average
6.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 118.8%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.60%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLithuanian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%