Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,129,587 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 337.6 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $46,569, a difference of 16.9%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $108,251, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $89,640, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,818, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $96,824, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (62.6% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.3%).