Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Australia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Australia

Fair
Excellent
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Australia Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,009,965 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Australia.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Australia Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $57,953, a difference of 45.5%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $67,634, a difference of 34.5%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $126,620, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $56,660, a difference of 16.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $69,164, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $46,573, a difference of 22.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$57,953
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$126,620
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$102,562
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$56,305
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$67,634
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$46,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$56,660
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$115,947
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$119,308
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$69,164
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.0%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.48%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.4%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
26.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
13.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
52.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 74.9%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
72.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
67.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
55.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
20.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Australia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Australia
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%