Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,614,436 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $49,173, a difference of 23.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $111,602, a difference of 22.1%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $114,553, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,540, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $42,542, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $65,326, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.4%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.3%).