Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,533,650 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.817% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 816.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $29,031, a difference of 37.2%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $70,989, a difference of 33.1%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $59,159, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $42,380, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $33,046, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 96.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 93.1%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 31.5%), single female poverty (22.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 40.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 107.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 43.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 56.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 50.3%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.47%), 11th grade (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.1%).