Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,475,252 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 28.8 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $101,492, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $46,455, a difference of 16.6%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $89,900, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $49,804, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $40,576, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $47,902, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (94.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.37%), 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.58%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%).