Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Icelanders

Fair
Good
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Icelander Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,353,005 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Icelanders.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Icelander Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 20.2%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $44,987, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $102,261, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $39,109, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,247, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,916, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Excellent
$44,987
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Good
$104,282
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Good
$85,797
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Good
$46,916
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Good
$55,415
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Fair
$39,109
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$51,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Good
$95,560
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Good
$102,261
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Average
$61,270
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.1%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Average
82.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Icelander Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarIcelander
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%