Filipino vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,345,680 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $85,681, a difference of 34.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $95,511, a difference of 34.8%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $44,076, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.89%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $51,493, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $61,621, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 74.1%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.9%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%).