Filipino vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,256,586 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Asians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.326% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 1,325.9 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $50,057, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $63,827, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $119,955, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $57,003, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $44,586, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.1%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%).