Filipino vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,632,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $95,560, a difference of 34.7%), median household income ($115,509 compared to $85,797, a difference of 34.6%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $55,415, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $51,247, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $61,270, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 41.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.85%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.34%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%).