Filipino vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,559,392 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $29,031, a difference of 103.5%), median household income ($115,509 compared to $59,159, a difference of 95.3%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $70,989, a difference of 95.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 32.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $42,380, a difference of 36.2%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $33,046, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 193.6%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 184.7%), and family poverty (6.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 182.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 59.5%), single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 65.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 131.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 119.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 119.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 124.1%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 88.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.65, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 163.2%), doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 154.4%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 148.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 92.4%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 28.3%).