Filipino vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Ghanaians

Exceptional
Fair
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,749,189 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Ghanaians.
Filipino Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Filipino vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $90,137, a difference of 42.8%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $52,810, a difference of 40.6%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $42,164, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $52,594, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $40,429, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $60,043, a difference of 27.7%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricFilipinoGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
22.3%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 88.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 69.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.3%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.7%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoGhanaian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
14.0%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoGhanaian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Good
83.0%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 67.0%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoGhanaian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
34.3%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 58.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.1%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
5.2%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Average
1.8%

Filipino vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
Filipino vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%