Filipino vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,129,290 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $31,729, a difference of 86.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $74,257, a difference of 81.7%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $63,681, a difference of 81.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $47,012, a difference of 22.8%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $35,266, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $49,234, a difference of 55.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 167.1%), family poverty (6.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 142.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 136.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.2%), and single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 58.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 288.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 238.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 237.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 94.9%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.82, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 139.4%), doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 132.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 11th grade (94.1% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 81.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.8%).