Filipino vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,752,510 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $39,870, a difference of 48.1%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $51,473, a difference of 44.2%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $97,288, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $52,365, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $38,528, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 90.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 59.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.94%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.7%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.35, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.57%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 126.2%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 113.1%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 53.4%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.9%).