Filipino vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,635,702 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 25.5 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $99,813, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $111,676, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $117,930, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $54,571, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $54,159, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 24.7%), divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.23%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and high school diploma (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%).