Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,860,814 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 52.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,325 compared to $98,205, a difference of 20.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,407 compared to $96,086, a difference of 19.1%), and median male earnings ($62,728 compared to $52,860, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $52,302, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($44,066 compared to $38,945, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.58%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.5%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%).