Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,227,312 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $38,945, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,289 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $91,171, a difference of 0.88%), and median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $52,860, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.9%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.7%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.82%).