Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,674,697 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($109,418 compared to $98,205, a difference of 11.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $96,086, a difference of 10.8%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $52,860, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $52,302, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $38,945, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($49,463 compared to $45,682, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.99%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.33%).