Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,116,797 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.213% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,213.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $43,997, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $98,205, a difference of 25.0%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $52,860, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $52,302, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $38,945, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 70.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).