Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,711,942 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 39.3 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $52,302, a difference of 6.2%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $43,997, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($97,958 compared to $98,205, a difference of 0.25%), median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $38,945, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($46,333 compared to $45,682, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 54.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 48.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%).