South African vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,357,408 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $52,860, a difference of 16.3%), median family income ($113,229 compared to $98,205, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $56,975, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $52,302, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $38,945, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($50,752 compared to $45,682, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.82%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.4%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.41%).