Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,877,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $43,997, a difference of 17.2%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $52,860, a difference of 14.3%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $98,205, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $52,302, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.6%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (42.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.41%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%).