Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,089,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $43,997, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $38,945, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $45,682, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,302, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $96,086, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.97%), receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty (14.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.4%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.4%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.32%), 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.1%).