Slavic vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,002,740 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.291% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 291.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $56,975, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $98,205, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $38,945, a difference of 1.7%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $43,997, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $52,302, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 30.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.9%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and college, under 1 year (66.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%).