Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Uruguay

Excellent
Fair
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,799,378 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.704% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 704.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($116,165 compared to $98,205, a difference of 18.3%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $52,860, a difference of 17.7%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,997, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,302, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,945, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Average
$43,997
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$98,205
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Poor
$82,560
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Fair
$45,682
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Poor
$52,860
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Poor
$38,945
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Average
$52,302
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Poor
$91,171
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Poor
$96,086
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Tragic
$56,975
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
24.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Poor
12.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
51.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.3%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Poor
58.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.36%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Uruguay
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%