Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,409,718 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.7%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $43,997, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $52,302, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $52,860, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $91,171, a difference of 0.18%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $45,682, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.8%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (45.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%).