British vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,737,134 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 36.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $56,975, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($108,705 compared to $98,205, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $52,302, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $38,945, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($48,189 compared to $45,682, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.32%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 57.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).