Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,281,962 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 146.9 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($113,434 compared to $98,205, a difference of 15.5%), median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $52,860, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $96,086, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $52,302, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $38,945, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.2%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.66%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.93%).