Crow vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,393,602 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.865% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 1,864.7 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $43,997, a difference of 38.7%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $82,560, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $96,086, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,945, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,302, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $56,975, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 96.1%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 94.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 223.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 221.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 216.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.23, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.3%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.4%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.040%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.74%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).