Maltese vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,342,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 103.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $91,171, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $96,086, a difference of 19.4%), and median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $52,860, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $52,302, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($43,357 compared to $38,945, a difference of 11.3%), and per capita income ($49,640 compared to $43,997, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.9%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.6%).